Attending a high school with wealthy students has more influence on both education and life successes than attending a high school with high achievers. A recent study by University of Tubingen and University of Illinois Urbana Champagne indicates that high socioeconomic status correlates to a lifetime of academic and career success. Students do better if the other students are average academic achievers rather than high achievers. Hmm.
So go to school with rich kids who are B students? Obviously networking is a given with wealthy connections, but average students? Maybe it’s because competing against overachievers may be debilitating whereas competing against average students creates a healthy and doable challenge. Either way, the rich get richer, and sadly, the poor remain poor.
[Source]